The kinematics of amblypygid (Arachnida) pedipalps during predation: extreme elongation in raptorial appendages does not result in a proportionate increase in reach and closing speed

McLean, Callum J ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4402-8550, Brassey, Charlotte A ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6552-541X, Seiter, Michael ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8762-4665, Garwood, Russell J ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2803-9471 and Gardiner, James D ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1902-3416 (2024) The kinematics of amblypygid (Arachnida) pedipalps during predation: extreme elongation in raptorial appendages does not result in a proportionate increase in reach and closing speed. Journal of Experimental Biology, 227 (4). jeb246654. ISSN 0022-0949

Preview

Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

The link between form and function is key to understanding the evolution of unique and/or extreme morphologies. Amblypygids, or whip spiders, are arachnids that often have highly elongated spined pedipalps. These limbs are used to strike at, and secure, prey before processing by the chelicerae. Amblypygi pedipalps are multifunctional, however, being used in courtship and contest, and vary greatly in form between species. Increased pedipalp length may improve performance during prey capture, but length could also be influenced by factors including territorial contest and sexual selection. Here for the first time, we use high-speed videography and manual tracking to investigate kinematic differences in prey capture between amblypygid species. Across six morphologically diverse species, spanning four genera and two families, we create a total dataset of 86 trials (9-20 per species). Prey capture kinematics varied considerably between species, with differences being expressed in pedipalp joint angle ranges. In particular, maximum reach ratio did not remain constant with total pedipalp length, as geometric scaling would predict, but decreased with longer pedipalps. This suggests that taxa with the most elongated pedipalps do not deploy their potential length advantage to proportionally increase reach. Therefore, a simple mechanical explanation of increased reach does not sufficiently explain pedipalp elongation. We propose other factors to help explain this phenomenon, such as social interactions or sexual selection, which would produce an evolutionary trade-off in pedipalp length between prey capture performance and other behavioural and/or anatomical pressures.