A comprehensive estimate of the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities

Wright, David ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9568-0237, Matthew, Scott, Sarah, Kraeutner, Barhoun, Pamela, Bertollo, Maurizio, Campbell, Mark, Waltzing, Baptiste, Dahm, Stephan, Esselaar, Maaike, Frank, Cornelia, Hardwick, Robert, Fuelscher, Ian, Marshall, Ben, Hodges, Nicola, Hyde, Christian and Holmes, Paul (2024) A comprehensive estimate of the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities. Frontiers in Psychology. ISSN 1664-1078 (In Press)

	Supplemental Material File not available for download. Available under License In Copyright. Download (16kB)
	Accepted Version File not available for download. Available under License In Copyright. Download (1MB)

Abstract

The aim of this research was to establish prevalence estimates for aphantasia, hypophantasia, typical imagery ability, and hyperphantasia in a large multi-national cohort. In Study 1, the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire was completed by 3049 participants. Results indicated prevalence estimates of 1.2% for aphantasia, 3% for hypophantasia, 89.9% for typical imagery ability, and 5.9% for hyperphantasia. In Study 2, to replicate these findings in a larger sample, the Study 1 data were combined with openly available data from previous prevalence studies to create a total sample of 9063 participants. Re-analysis of this data confirmed prevalence estimates of 0.9% for aphantasia, 3.3% for hypophantasia, 89.7% for typical imagery ability, and 6.1% for hyperphantasia. These robust and up-to-date estimates provide enhanced clarity to researchers regarding the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities and provide a platform for future studies exploring the role of visual imagery in various cognitive and behavioural tasks.