e-space
Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository

    Cardiopulmonary Response in Post-COVID-19 Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study Comparing the Londrina Activities of Daily Living Protocol, 6-Minute Walk Test, and Glittre Activities of Daily Living Test

    Al Yammahi, Reem Jasim ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3625-1073, Alaparthi, Gopala Krishna ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7596-3459, de Sá Ferreira, Arthur ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7014-2002, Bairapareddy, Kalyana Chakravarthy and Hegazy, Fatma A ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7457-083X (2024) Cardiopulmonary Response in Post-COVID-19 Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study Comparing the Londrina Activities of Daily Living Protocol, 6-Minute Walk Test, and Glittre Activities of Daily Living Test. Healthcare, 12 (7). 712. ISSN 2227-9032

    [img]
    Preview
    Published Version
    Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

    Download (276kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    <jats:p>This study addresses the imperative need for reliable assessment protocols in guiding rehabilitation interventions for individuals post-COVID-19, considering the enduring physiological effects of the virus. A cohort of 40 post-COVID-19 individuals underwent assessments using the Londrina ADL protocol, Glittre ADL test, and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Physiological parameters were recorded during and after each test, including heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation. The post hoc comparisons between the pre-test and post-test cardiopulmonary response of the three tests showed significant differences, except diastolic blood pressure (6MWT vs. Londrina ADL protocol), heart rate (6MWT vs. Londrina ADL protocol), respiratory rate (6MWT vs. Londrina ADL protocol), blood oxygen level (SpO2) (6MWT vs. Londrina ADL protocol), dyspnea (Londrina ADL protocol vs. Glittre ADL test), and fatigue (Londrina ADL protocol vs. Glittre ADL test). The Londrina ADL protocol demonstrated cardio-pulmonary responses comparable to the Glittre ADL test, as well as the 6MWT, emphasizing its effectiveness in evaluating walking-related outcomes. The study concludes that the Londrina ADL protocol is a robust and practical tool for the routine clinical testing of daily living activities in post-COVID-19 individuals. While the 6MWT remains valuable for assessing walking-related outcomes, a combined approach employing the Londrina ADL protocol and 6MWT offers a comprehensive strategy for evaluating multifaceted functional capacities in this population.</jats:p>

    Impact and Reach

    Statistics

    Activity Overview
    6 month trend
    60Downloads
    6 month trend
    133Hits

    Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.

    Altmetric

    Repository staff only

    Edit record Edit record