e-space
Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository

    Negotiating difference in political contexts: An exploration of Hansard

    Archer, Dawn (2018) Negotiating difference in political contexts: An exploration of Hansard. Language Sciences, 68. pp. 22-41. ISSN 0388-0001

    [img]
    Preview
    Accepted Version
    Download (1MB) | Preview

    Abstract

    This paper explores the language of MPs and Peers, when negotiating their differences in times past. Specifically, I draw upon Historic Hansard data (1803–2005) representative of the two Houses (Commons and Lords), paying particular attention to exchanges involving expressive politeness features (deferential terms, polite preludes, etc.). I demonstrate how such features enabled parliamentarians to “do” deference and respect, but sometimes at a surface level only. For example, utterances containing expressive politeness features functioned as implicit accusations relating to another’s inaccurate or misguided views on a particular issue and/or as a means of claiming a conflicting position. I suggest that, because such behaviour was (and remains) institutionally sanctioned and deliberately ritualistic, it did not then nor does not now constitute systematic impoliteness, in the main (cf. Harris, 2001). Rather, we witness a range of facework behaviour in parliamentary debates: from face enhancement to face aggravation, and everything between (Archer, 2015).

    Impact and Reach

    Statistics

    Activity Overview
    6 month trend
    315Downloads
    6 month trend
    339Hits

    Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.

    Altmetric

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item